BREADCRUMB
Member States’ case law on the application of the European Small Claims Procedure
Country |
Jurisprudence |
Austria |
LG Feldkirch, 14. 6. 2012, 2 R 131/12y Zak 2012/567, 298 |
Belgium |
Com. Gand, 23 décembre 2013, T.G.R., 2011, p. 272 |
Bulgaria |
Bourgas District Court Court order №9017 of 5.11.2012
Bourgas Regional Court, Court order of 14.02.2011; not final
|
Czech Republic |
Constitutional Court, Judgement I.ÚS 2210/11 #1 of 30. 8. 2011 |
Estonia |
Harju County Court, Decision nr 2-11-40908 of 29.12.2011 |
France |
Juridiction de proximité Angers, 6 Décembre 2010 N° 91.10-438, Vielle Société By Lifestyle 4 U Gmbh |
Germany |
Amtsgericht Gießen, 23 Apri 2013 – 49 C 381/12
Amtsgericht Geldern,9 February, 2011 – 4 C 4/11
|
Latvia |
Jelgava court, Decision No. C15285811 of 27 January 2012 [not published] |
Lithuania |
Vilniaus miesto 1 apylinkės teismo 2012 m. lapkričio 8 d. sprendimas c. b. R. O. D. v. AirBaltic Administration, Nr. 2-5443-129/2012, kat. 35.4 ;116.1.
Vilniaus miesto 1 apylinkės teismo 2012 m. birželio 27 d. sprendimas c. b. R. O. D. v. Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft, Nr. 2-5442-790/2012, kat. 35.4; 116.1.
Vilniaus miesto 1 apylinkės teismo 2012 m. birželio 8 d. sprendimas c. b. I. R. firma „Lemurija“ v. Essentially Oils Limited, Nr. 2-1741-430/2012, kat. 116.1.
Druskininkų miesto apylinkės teismo 2012 m. gegužės 7 d. nutartis c. b. SIA GRAVIDUS v. UAB „Transtaja“, Nr. 2-404-182/2012, kat. 103.4.; 106.3.
Vilniaus miesto 1 apylinkės teismo 2012 m. sausio 12 d. sprendimas c. b. A. K. v. „Hotel Fortina“, Nr. 2-504-465/2012, kat. 116.1.
Kauno miesto apylinkės teismo 2011 m. rugsėjo 26 d. sprendimas c. b. E. C. v. V. K., Nr. 2 13861-886/2011, kat. 116.1; 130.2.5.
Vilniaus miesto 1 apylinkės teismo 2011 m. vasario 25 d. sprendimas c. b. UAB Agentūra „Jungtinės spaudos paslaugos“ v. Beer Konzept, Nr. 2-2874-790/2011, kat. 35.4; 116.1.
Vilniaus rajono apylinkės teismo 2011 m. vasario 11 d. sprendimas c. b. A. S. v. Air Baltic Corporation AS, Nr. E2-390-855/2011, kat. 44.2.4.1.; 44.5.2.; 44.8.
|
Luxembourg |
Cour d‘Appel, 14 mars 2012, No 36170 du rôle
Tribunal d‘arrondissement de Luxembourg, 16 mars 2011, No 132113; 286/11 du rôle
Tribunal d‘arrondissement de Luxembourg, 4 mars 2010, No 121585, 125280 et 125656; 309/10 du rôle
Tribunal d‘arrondissement de Luxembourg, 13 janvier 2010, No 123807; 15/2010 du rôle
Tribunal d‘arrondissement de Luxembourg, 20 mai 2009, No 112605 et 112606; 112/2009 du rôle
Cour d‘Appel, 8 janvier 2009, No 32781 du rôle
|
Malta |
Caruana Dr Giovanni Vs Rynair Limited Et, 24/04/2013, 2/2012
Debono Charles Et Vs Thrifty Car Rentals, 14/03/2012, 14/2011
Leberth Beatrix Vs Agiliter Limited, 12/03/2012, 7/2011
Molnarova Gyongyi Vs Ec Malta Language House, 18/01/2012, 6/2011
Gilford Brian Vs Howie Andrew, 16/06/2011, 2/2011
Farrugia Anthony Vs But It Direct Limited, 07/02/2011, 39/2010
Sergej Turygin Vs Pace Georg, 11/11/2010, 1/2009
Fava Jean Pierre Vs Mc Carthy Cars (Uk) Limited, 01/06/2010, 2/2010
Zammit Jonathan Vs Easyjet (Equiti) Limited, 18/05/2010, 1/2010
Spiteri Emanuela Vs Costa Crociere S.p.a., 24/04/2013, 1/2013
(All judgments available here)
|
Slovak Republic |
a. Decision of appellate courts
Krajský súd Banská Bystrica, Decision no. 1CoE/192/2013 of 21.05.2013
Krajský súd Košice, Decision no. 3Co/2/2012 of 30.03.2012
Krajský súd Košice, Decision no. 1Co/275/2011 of 14.02.2012
Krajský súd Bratislava, Decision no. 1Cob/95/2012 of 28.02.2013
Krajský súd Košice, Decision no. 9Co/271/2012 of 28.02.2013
b. Examples of decisions of first instance courts
Okresný súd Liptovský Mikuláš, Decision no. 9Cb/268/2012 of 29.07.2013
Okresný súd Žilina, Decision no. 17C/16/2013 of 01.07.2013
Okresný súd Dunajská Streda, Decision no. 11Cb/12/2013 of 26.06.2013
|
Spain |
Audiencia Provincial of Málaga (Section 4), Sentencia nº 200/2012 of 19 April, JUR 2012\298986
Audiencia Provincial of Barcelona (Section 4), Sentencia nº 513/2012 of 26 September, JUR 2013\167605
Supreme Court (Sala de lo Civil, Section 1), Auto of 7 May 2013, JUR 2013\181072
Audiencia Provincial of Alicante (Section 4), Auto nº 203/2010 of 27 October, JUR 2011\22528
Audiencia Provincial of Madrid (Section 25), Auto nº 171/2012 of 19 October, JUR 2012\373961
|
Sweden |
Hovrätten för Övre Norrland, mål nr Ö 1002-11, 20.2.2012
Svea hovrätt, mål Ö 5624-10, 15.12.2010.
|
The Netherlands |
District Court Maastricht 5 February 2010, ECLI:NL:RBMAA:2010:BL4324.
District Court Maastricht, 5 February 2010, ECLI:NL:RBMAA:2010:BL5933.
District Court Groningen, 8 March 2010, ECLI:NL:RBGRO:2010:BO2532 (interim judgment) and District Court of Groningen, 5 June 2010, ECLI:NL:RBGRO:2010:BO2533 (final judgment).
District Court Hertogenbosch, 6 July 2010, ECLI:NL:RBSHE:2010:BN0588.
District Court Amsterdam, 30 August 2010, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2010:BO2995.
District Court Hertogenbosch, 13 Dec 2010, ECLI:NL:RBSHE:2010:BO7878
District Court Amsterdam, 27 June 2011, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2011:BT8420.
District Court Hertogenbosch, 13 Oct 2011, ECLI:NL:RBSHE:2011:BY8209
District Court Hertogenbosch 19 Jan 2012, ECLI:NL:RBSHE:2012:BV1931.
District Court Haarlem 23 July 2012, ECLI:NL:RBHAA:2012:BX2763.
District Court Hertogenbosch 29 Nov 2012, ECLI:NL:RBSHE:2012:BY8206.
Court of Appeal Hertogenbosch 13 Dec 2012, ECLI:NL:GHSHE:2012:BZ1135
District Court Oost-Brabant 31 January 2013, ECLI:NL:RBOBR:2013:BZ0842.
District Court Oost-Brabant 14 Feb 2013, ECLI:NL:RBOBR:2013:BZ1373.
District Court Oost-Brabant 14 Feb 2013, ECLI:NL:RBOBR:2013:BZ1387.
District Court Oost-Brabant 28 March 2013, ECLI:NL:RBOBR:2013:BZ6072.
District Court Oost-Brabant 18 April 2013, ECLI:NL:RBOBR:2013:BZ8361.
District Court Noord-Holland 24 April 2013, ECLI:NL:RBNHO:2013:CA0280.
District Court Noord-Holland 6 May 2013, ECLI:NL:RBNHO:2013:CA0769.
District Court Oost-Brabant 4 July 2013, ECLI:NL:RBOBR:2013:2847.
|