Effective remedies

Christina Olsen Lundh

Effective remedies

Christina Olsen Lundh

Information

CV
MP3-Version

Standard version

This version of the e-presentation allows you to jump back and forward to the section of most interest.

Certified version

This version requires you to view the full e-presentation and to take a short quiz at the end. A certificate can then be issued entitling you to CPD points in selected jurisdictions.

Chapters

Effective remedies
Overview
The principle of national procedural autonomy
The principle of equivalence (1/2)
The principle of equivalence (2/2)
The effectiveness requirement
C-312/93 Peterbroeck; C-430-431/93 Van Schijndel
The principle of cooperation in good faith (TEU article 4(3)) )(1/2)
The principle of cooperation in good faith (TEU article 4(3)) )(2/2)
Case C-201/02 Wells p 67
Article 19 (1) TEU
”national procedural responsibility”
As summarized in C-416/10 Križan p 85
Article 47(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU
The Aarhus Convention refers to effective remedies
Article 9 (4)
How to acutally do that???
C-72/12, Altrip (1/4)
C-72/12, Altrip (2/4)
C-72/12, Altrip (3/4)
C-72/12, Altrip (4/4)
The case ended up in the European Union Court of Justice!
C‑115/09 Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland, Landesverband Nordrhein‑Westfalen (Trianel Kohlekraftwerk Lünen), p 37
Objective mentioned in A 11
Article 11
”The question of conditionality”
Wide access to justice
The principle of the procedural autonomy
The member state must not…
”The question of conditionality”
Shifting of the burden of proof (1/2)
Shifting of the burden of proof (2/2)
The burden of proof
What to do…
…when lack of compliance with EU environmental law?
C-201/02 Delena Wells (1/3)
C-201/02 Delena Wells (2/3)
C-201/02 Delena Wells (3/3)
Joined Cases C-128/09 to C-131/09, C-134/09 and C-135/09 Boxus and C 182/10, Solvay (1/4)
Joined Cases C-128/09 to C-131/09, C-134/09 and C-135/09 Boxus and C 182/10, Solvay (2/4)
Joined Cases C-128/09 to C-131/09, C-134/09 and C-135/09 Boxus and C 182/10, Solvay (3/4)
Joined Cases C-128/09 to C-131/09, C-134/09 and C-135/09 Boxus and C 182/10, Solvay (4/4)
C-348/15 Stadt Wiener Neustadt
C-348/15 Stadt Wiener Neustadt p 47
C-348/15 Stadt Wiener Neustadt p 31
It is for the national court to ascertain whether those conditions have been satisfied
C-416/10 Križan
C-399/14 Grüne Liga Sachsen
One of the questions
C-399/14 Grüne Liga Sachsen
A plan or project already implemented
C-41/11 Inter-Environnement Wallonie
C-379/15 Association France Nature Environnement
C-41/11 Inter-Environnement Wallonie, C-379/15 Association France Nature (1/4)
C-41/11 Inter-Environnement Wallonie, C-379/15 Association France Nature (2/4)
C-41/11 Inter-Environnement Wallonie, C-379/15 Association France Nature (3/4)
C-41/11 Inter-Environnement Wallonie, C-379/15 Association France Nature (4/4)
C-196/16 and C-197/16 Comune di Corridonia
Two municipalities, Comune di Corridonia and Comune di Loro Piceno, considered this procedure incompatible with EU law.
C-196/16 and C-197/16 Comune di Corridonia
How can an ex-post EIA exceptionally be compatible with EU law?
Prevention rather than reparation!
Article 4 TEU
The Member State concerned
And now we are getting to the core question
Furthermore
”Make good any harm”
C-201/02 Delena Wells
C-420/11 Leth
C-420/11 Leth, p 36, 38
C-420/11 Leth, p 41
If competent administrative authorities fail to take measures…
C-237/07 Janecek ”preparation of action plans”, p 39-42 (1/2)
C-237/07 Janecek ”preparation of action plans”, p 39-42 (2/2)
C-404/13 Client Earth, p 58
Interim measures - injuctive relief -
C-416/10 Križan
C-416/10 Križan, p 109
C-416/10 Križan, p 110

Question 1 of 3

Question 2 of 3

Question 3 of 3

Summary

e-Presentation ended

Short text